>>3 >The subject of this Essay is not the so-called Liberty of the Will, so >unfortunately opposed to the misnamed doctrine of Philosophical Necessity; >but Civil, or Social Liberty
(続き) >>6 >First, by obtaining a recognition of certain immunities, called political liberties >or rights, which it was to be regarded as a breach of duty in the ruler to >infringe, and which if he did infringe, specific resistance, or general rebellion, >was held to be justifiable.