If you think that teachers don't point to your mistakes everytime in spite of your request, I think you should think about your English accuracy and attitude. First, people don't want to slngle out someone's failures all the time if your English is not accurate enough. Second, if you show your emotion that you are annoyed when you get corrections, instructors will hesitate to give corrections next time.
On the other hand, if a teacher pefers to make corrections as many as he/she can, I think the person tends to be high-handed. A personality that is very assertive to things, “whichever is OK,” can be an example.
Whether the man is a Japanese speaker or English, in my opinion it doesn’t matter on that kin of personality.
＞誤りを訂正してくれと言って、相手がやってくれないとしたら、 ＞まずは自分の英語力や態度を疑うべきだと思う。 You should look back on both your English skills and attitude if your teachers don’t correct your English although you ask them to do so. ＞間違いが多すぎると、とても毎回訂正する気にはならないし、 ＞訂正されてイラッとしたのを表情に出す人だと次から言いたくなくなる。 They are unwilling to correct your errors every time you cannot write properly in many parts. Also, they don’t want to respond to your questions anymore if you show your irritation when your English is revised.
>>473 ＞If you think that teachers don't point to your mistakes everytime in spite of your request, I think you should think about your English accuracy and attitude.
アメリカ人の最初の2行についての感想。 Ummm.... not sure what you're trying to say. Do you mean the teachers don't point out mistakes? And is the subject English language?
＞ believe that the world will remain as peaceful in the future as it does now despite a number of problems, such as global warming, a population explosion, and environmental destruction.
＞ believe that the world will remain as peaceful in the future as it does now despite a number of problems, such as global warming, a population explosion, and environmental destruction.
I believe that the world will remain as peaceful in the future as it does now despite a number of problems, such as global warming, a population explosion, and environmental destruction. I give two reasons that support my belief. Firstly, effective diplomacy will solve international disputes. For example, the United Nations has been able to help many countries involved in a conflict to conclude a peace treaty. Secondly, the development of information technology will enable different countries to know each other better and to reduce mutual misunderstanding. Most of the international disputes are caused by avoidable misunderstanding, which is provoked by lack of knowledge about each other. For the above two reasons, I believe that the world will remain as peaceful in the future as it does now.
Firstly, fundamentally the United Nations exists to protect the national interests of victors during WW2. The permanent members of the Security Council are the victors exclusively afforded the right to veto, so if one of them uses this right, nothing can be decided. Moreover, this right is often used not for the world peace.
Firstly, the United Nations exists to protect the national interests of the prevailing countries of WW2. The permanent members of the Security Council are the victors and they are exclusively afforded the right to veto. If one of them chooses to exercise this right, nothing can be decided. Moreover, this right is not often used for to attain world peace.
>Secondly, the United Nations Human Rights Commission is often used for propaganda. Council members include countries notorious for human rights violation, such as China, which are very influential. They are not interested in internal matters. In this environment, human rights issues cannot be solved.
Secondly, the United Nations Human Rights Commission is often a tool for propaganda. Council members include influential countries notorious for human rights violations, for example China. China is infamous for its discrimination against its citizens. Human rights issues cannot be solved by a country that regularly commits atrocities itself.
There are a number of problems in the world, such as global warming, a population explosion, and environmental destruction. However, I believe that the world will remain as peaceful in the future as it is now for the following two reasons. Firstly, we can settle an international dispute using diplomacy. For example, the United Nations can help countries involved in a conflict to sign a peace treaty. Secondly, the development of information technology will enable countries to know each other better and to reduce misunderstandings. Most of the international disputes are caused by misunderstandings, which is provoked by a lack of mutual knowledge. For the above two reasons, I believe that the world will remain as peaceful in the future as it is now.
Camblyのレッスンの受け方 Please read the sentences out loud one by one. I'll repeat each one after you. と言ってダイアローグのリピーティングをまずやる。 で、それが終わったらロールプレイング。 I take the part of Kevin（Dorothy）. After that, please switch roles. と言う。 時間が来たらこちらから Time's up. Thank you for your good lesson. Good-bye. という。 それからレッスン終了のクリックをする。 こちらから終了を持ち出さないと 持ち時間があって講師に後の予約が入っていない場合どんどん延長される。
