[表示 : 全て 最新50 1-99 101- 201- 301- 401- 501- 601- 701- 801- 901- 2chのread.cgiへ]
Update time : 05/10 01:31 / Filesize : 362 KB / Number-of Response : 901
[このスレッドの書き込みを削除する]
[+板 最近立ったスレ&熱いスレ一覧 : +板 最近立ったスレ/記者別一覧] [類似スレッド一覧]


↑キャッシュ検索、類似スレ動作を修正しました、ご迷惑をお掛けしました

日本の捕鯨が持つ正当性を、対抗動画をもって知らしめようぜ その6



254 名前:名無しさん@お腹いっぱい。 mailto:sage [2008/03/09(日) 02:23:13 ID:pQHdDzMI0]
www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/07/2183690.htm
eot8857 の投稿がよくまとまってて良い (ここの住人じゃないよな?w)
長文なので一部抜粋

Under Article 6 of the treaty, it specifies that although Australia (as well as the other claimholders) has jurisdiction over
its territory and even any ice shelves connected, it DOES NOT have jurisdiction of the high seas over other countries.
This is why their sanctuary is not recognized by many countries, including Japan.

It's very romantic to say "I had on kevlar, which didn't protect me, but my whale-protector's badge saved my life"
but I'm afraid I don't buy it. The Japanese coast guard doesn't use armor piercing bullets; not even the US Coast
Guard, which deals with Columbian drug boats on a daily basis, use those kinds of bullets in their rifles and side-arms.

南極の領有権問題を突くのは効果的
バッヂで助かったって話はアホらしすぎて逆効果w







[ 続きを読む ] / [ 携帯版 ]

全部読む 前100 次100 最新50 [ このスレをブックマーク! 携帯に送る ] 2chのread.cgiへ
[+板 最近立ったスレ&熱いスレ一覧 : +板 最近立ったスレ/記者別一覧](;´∀`)<362KB

read.cgi ver5.27 [feat.BBS2 +1.6] / e.0.2 (02/09/03) / eucaly.net products.
担当:undef