[表示 : 全て 最新50 1-99 101- 201- 301- 401- 501- 601- 701- 801- 901- 1001- 2ch.scのread.cgiへ]
Update time : 05/17 08:52 / Filesize : 259 KB / Number-of Response : 1002
[このスレッドの書き込みを削除する]
[+板 最近立ったスレ&熱いスレ一覧 : +板 最近立ったスレ/記者別一覧] [類似スレッド一覧]


↑キャッシュ検索、類似スレ動作を修正しました、ご迷惑をお掛けしました

【余命vs弁護士】弁護士への不当な懲戒請求のべ4000件 960人提訴へ(1人60万円請求) 扇動したブログ主の刑事責任追及★7



639 名前:名無しさん@1周年 [2018/05/17(木) 08:23:27.12 ID:A4EnMeYZ0.net]
>>246
>残念ながら個人の訴訟は同じ場所というのは同じ居住地の当事者間でしかあり得ないからね。

(民事に限定しての話し)
裁判所が受理するのは構わないが、どこを係争地とするかは人権上の問題で、弁明をする機会がないことが
客観的に明らかなら尚更、当事者にとっては受け入れがたいものだろう

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction#Principles_of_personal_jurisdiction

Consent
The United States legal system is an adversarial system. Civil suits cannot be initiated by third parties,
but must be filed by the aggrieved party who seeks redress. Generally, the action is initiated in the
jurisdiction where the event occurred, where the defendant can be served or where the parties have
agreed to have the case located. The filing of a complaint or prayer for relief is a voluntary action by
the person aggrieved, and as a necessity of this request, the person seeking relief consents to be bound
by the judgment of the court. The doctrine of consent is also extended to defendants who attend and
litigate actions without challenging the court's personal jurisdiction. Consent may also derive from a
pre-litigation agreement by the parties, such as a forum selection clause in a contract (not to be confused
with a choice of law clause). Doctrines such as claim preclusion prevent re-litigation of failed complaints
in alternative forums. Claim preclusion does not, however, prevent the refiling of a claim that was filed in
a court that did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant.






[ 続きを読む ] / [ 携帯版 ]

全部読む 前100 次100 最新50 [ このスレをブックマーク! 携帯に送る ] 2chのread.cgiへ
[+板 最近立ったスレ&熱いスレ一覧 : +板 最近立ったスレ/記者別一覧]( ´∀`)<259KB

read.cgi ver5.27 [feat.BBS2 +1.6] / e.0.2 (02/09/03) / eucaly.net products.
担当:undef