The first report (not a paper with full proofs) about the meeting, shortly after the meeting and several months before the award of the Fields Medals, included a hugely incorrect version of IUT, based on a gross erroneous oversimplification of IUT. The report demonstrated various misundestandings of the theory including the difference between frobenius-like structures and etale-like structures in IUT. Its text includes no proof that the caricature version of IUT is equal to IUT. It included such very strange from the standard mathematical point of view phrases as ‘we are certain that even with all subtleties restored, the issue we are pointing out will prevail’, ‘it seems to us’. The report essentially denies the use of anabelian geometry and infinitely many theatres in IUT, since the group of automorphisms of objects is reduce to the trivial one.17 For various details see this page18 and these report and text19 of the author of IUT.
