Xの描画が一番速いグ� ..
237:233
03/10/25 14:23 R6tl7/7D
一応>>233と同じマシンでやってみました．
GeForce4Ti4200 1024x768@24bpp PIII1Gx2 PC133 1024MB
nVidia driver 1.0-4496(AGP2x)
x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40201000 on :0.0
Sat Oct 25 14:53:10 2003
Sync time adjustment is 0.0346 msecs.
40000 reps @ 0.1601 msec ( 6250.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
28000000 reps @ 0.0002 msec (4920000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
12000 reps @ 0.4078 msec ( 2450.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
360 reps @ 15.5935 msec ( 64.1/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1200 reps @ 5.2059 msec ( 192.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
glxgears
14812 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2962.400 FPS
16668 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3333.600 FPS
16667 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3333.400 FPS
16671 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3334.200 FPS
16668 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3333.600 FPS
速いんだかどうだかサッパリ判らん．．
238:233
03/10/25 14:26 R6tl7/7D
おまけ
#!/bin/bash
echo "x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500" >& bench.log
echo >> bench.log
/usr/X11R6/bin/x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500 >> bench.log
echo >> bench.log
echo "glxgears " >> bench.log
/usr/X11R6/bin/glxgears >> bench.log
※表記が変なのはご指摘ください．
お勉強しますので．
239:login:Penguin
03/10/25 18:45 vW9Oq7oQ
ベースを合わせたおかげで
>>232と>>236と>>237の比較ができるな
Linuxでは
Radeon9500(3700FPS) > GF4 4200(3300FPS) > Radeon7200(780FPS)
だな
240:login:Penguin
03/10/26 23:18 hsciF4/r
MillenniumII PCI 4MB 1024x768@24bpp AthlonXP2500+ DDR333 256MB
Vine2.6 2.4.20-0vl29.1 X標準のmga
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40201000 on :0.0
Sync time adjustment is 0.0230 msecs.
20000 reps @ 0.2914 msec ( 3430.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0006 msec (1650000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
800 reps @ 12.3954 msec ( 80.7/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
320 reps @ 17.5770 msec ( 56.9/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
800 reps @ 12.4011 msec ( 80.6/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
これを16bppでやると2倍くらいスコア上がる。
でも動画再生の負荷は16bppと24bppで10倍くらい違う…
24bppだと2500+なのにWMV9コマ落ちする。
241:login:Penguin
03/10/30 22:39 cJF4+4qd
>>235
解像度とbppは合わせなくて良い
242:login:Penguin
03/11/07 19:59 3XqVJ8Tf
どっちやねん
243:uid:774
03/11/07 20:25 dScB1zNo
色密度は解像度を表現する一要素にすぎない．
ここであわせているのはXｻｰﾊﾞの表示領域と色密度という表現だが，
＝解像度とみてそれほど外れてない．
故に，解像度とbppと表される色密度とは互いに直接比較する対象ではない．
が，ここではXでｸﾞﾗﾌｨｸｽｶｰﾄﾞの描画能力を比較したいので
計測条件を同じにしたいところだが，微妙な差は誤差の範疇
か否か判別困難な為，全く同じﾏｼﾝでｸﾞﾗﾌｨｸｽｶｰﾄﾞのみの変更
で比較できると最高ですな．
皆Knoppixで起動させて総合点で比較しても面白いかも．
244:login:Penguin
03/11/09 10:30 zgHVrVnx
ここってビデオカード一般のスレってことでいいすか?
速さ以外の話も OK?
245:
03/11/09 10:51 TCRqGsPA
表示の綺麗さについて質問したいんじゃが‥
246:login:Penguin
03/11/10 00:43 FEBZas+7
いいんじゃない、あんまりレスないし。
247:175
03/11/10 16:33 /MO1CwNt
redhat9からfedora core1にしたらglxgearsのスコアが上がった
14854 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2970.800 FPS
14855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2971.000 FPS
14802 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2960.400 FPS
一応x11pref
40000 reps @ 0.1416 msec ( 7060.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
20000000 reps @ 0.0003 msec (3300000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
20000 reps @ 0.2981 msec ( 3350.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
240 reps @ 24.2209 msec ( 41.3/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1200 reps @ 5.9101 msec ( 169.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
こっちも少し上がった?
248:login:Penguin
04/01/10 19:05 283vGdbN
虚しいスレだな。
249:login:Penguin
04/03/23 03:51 +uPqLswL
Athlon 2200+(Thoroughbred) PC2100(256M)X3 GeForce2 Pro(32M)
1280x1024@24bpp nvidiaドライバ
glxgears:
8040 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1608.000 FPS
8036 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1607.200 FPS
8041 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1608.200 FPS
x11perf:
20000 reps @ 0.2676 msec ( 3740.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
24000000 reps @ 0.0002 msec (4190000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
12000 reps @ 0.5274 msec ( 1900.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 10.7239 msec ( 93.2/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
2000 reps @ 2.6581 msec ( 376.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
250:175
04/03/24 14:53 av2kWqFZ
CPUがDuron800からAthlon2800+になったんだけどglxgears結果変わらず。
x11perfは上がった。
Sync time adjustment is 0.0283 msecs.
40000 reps @ 0.1421 msec ( 7040.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
36000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (6950000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
20000 reps @ 0.2956 msec ( 3380.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
1200 reps @ 5.5702 msec ( 180.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
3200 reps @ 1.7106 msec ( 585.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
さびしいスレですねw
251:login:Penguin
04/03/25 06:34 HymQX8Ng
新マシンに今も使ってるG550か FX5200か、どっち買おうかなー。
スレ違いだけど、安定してて動画再生時の CPU負荷がそこそこ少なけりゃいい。
gmplayerで root権限不要だといいけど。
252:login:Penguin
04/03/25 20:40 NLnbFGlv
FX5200 つことるよ。不安定感はないです。
253:175
04/03/26 22:36 E9kK385Q
俺もFX5200Ultra使ってるけどかなりいいよ。
nvidiaのlinux向けドライバは性能いいからね。
動画再生もデコーダー積んであるから負荷はほとんど無いよ。
#なんせ、winよりも性能が発揮できると公式に発言してるくらいですから
254:login:Penguin
04/04/01 03:13 Jf2nwKGs
がちゃがちゃいじって
入れてみた freedsktop.org
とりあえず Xvesaを
.xserverrcに基本的なパラメターだけつけて上げた。
Xmgaだと、cursorが通ったところに軌跡が残る。
Xdirectfbだと、しましまでなにも見えない。
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
freedesktop.org server version 6600 on :0.0
from localhost
Thu Apr 1 03:06:53 2004
Sync time adjustment is 0.0554 msecs.
2000 reps @ 3.6207 msec ( 276.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
1600000 reps @ 0.0034 msec (292000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
1600 reps @ 3.5545 msec ( 281.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 6.9276 msec ( 144.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1600 reps @ 3.5577 msec ( 281.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
255:login:Penguin
04/04/06 02:33 zjXYMoeB
「X」のキーを押しっぱなしにして、一番速く「X」を表示できるグラフィックカード
を選ぶスレはここですか？
っていうのは既出？
256:login:Penguin
04/04/10 16:38 fSt3cTO9
ワロタ
キーボードコントローラとか割り込み分解能ベンチになるのかな?w
257:login:Penguin
04/04/24 21:43 f2PNsf2B
radeon9000 proです。
x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput50
-> -shmput500 ShmPutImage 500x500 square
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
Gentoo Linux (XFree86 4.3.0, revision r5) server version 40300001 on :0.0
from misty
Sat Apr 24 21:39:57 2004
Sync time adjustment is 0.0370 msecs.
30000 reps @ 0.2317 msec ( 4320.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
1600000 reps @ 0.0041 msec (244000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
12000 reps @ 0.4697 msec ( 2130.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
400 reps @ 13.4816 msec ( 74.2/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1200 reps @ 5.3942 msec ( 185.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
この数値を見る限り、アクセレーションは効いてないっぽいなぁ。orz
258:GeForce FX5600
04/05/01 02:15 YxLH4gJ+
x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -pu
timage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40300000 on :0.0
from linux
Sat May 1 02:05:42 2004
Sync time adjustment is 0.0326 msecs.
30000 reps @ 0.2386 msec ( 4190.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
28000000 reps @ 0.0002 msec (5350000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
16000 reps @ 0.4058 msec ( 2460.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 11.5902 msec ( 86.3/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
2000 reps @ 2.8667 msec ( 349.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
259:GeForce FX 5800 + Barton2500
04/05/06 06:17 C9l0SpNh
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -p
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40300001 on :0.0
from phantom
Thu May 6 06:08:59 2004
Sync time adjustment is 0.0416 msecs.
40000 reps @ 0.1261 msec ( 7930.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
40000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (7260000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
20000 reps @ 0.3031 msec ( 3300.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800000 reps @ 0.0074 msec (135000.0/sec): PutImage 10x10 square
32000 reps @ 0.1683 msec ( 5940.0/sec): PutImage 100x100 square
800 reps @ 7.3834 msec ( 135.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
160000 reps @ 0.0319 msec ( 31400.0/sec): PutImage XY 10x10 square
16000 reps @ 0.3515 msec ( 2840.0/sec): PutImage XY 100x100 square
800 reps @ 11.9963 msec ( 83.4/sec): PutImage XY 500x500 square
2800000 reps @ 0.0020 msec (510000.0/sec): ShmPutImage 10x10 square
120000 reps @ 0.0535 msec ( 18700.0/sec): ShmPutImage 100x100 square
2800 reps @ 1.8429 msec ( 543.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
160000 reps @ 0.0379 msec ( 26400.0/sec): ShmPutImage XY 10x10 square
2800 reps @ 1.9221 msec ( 520.0/sec): ShmPutImage XY 100x100 square
80 reps @ 64.5365 msec ( 15.5/sec): ShmPutImage XY 500x500 square
800000 reps @ 0.0075 msec (133000.0/sec): Hide/expose window via popup (4 kids)
1600000 reps @ 0.0034 msec (291000.0/sec): Hide/expose window via popup (16 kids)
1750000 reps @ 0.0030 msec (337000.0/sec): Hide/expose window via popup (25 kids)
2000000 reps @ 0.0026 msec (380000.0/sec): Hide/expose window via popup (50 kids)
2250000 reps @ 0.0024 msec (417000.0/sec): Hide/expose window via popup (75 kids)
3000000 reps @ 0.0022 msec (460000.0/sec): Hide/expose window via popup (100 kids)
4000000 reps @ 0.0023 msec (434000.0/sec): Hide/expose window via popup (200 kids)
260:GeForce FX 5800 + Barton2500
04/05/06 06:26 C9l0SpNh
$ glxgears
21422 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4284.400 FPS
25991 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5198.200 FPS
25990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5198.000 FPS
25993 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5198.600 FPS
25992 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5198.400 FPS
25990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5198.000 FPS
25989 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5197.800 FPS
25995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5199.000 FPS
サラな環境
NVidia 5336 1280x1024@24 kernel 2.6.5 KT600
いじると早くなるのか?
261:login:Penguin
04/05/08 21:58 YfdaxF5D
で、結局、セッXの描画が一番速いグラフィックカードってどれ？ (；´Д`)ﾊｧﾊｧ
262:login:Penguin
04/05/19 22:13 oMegSaUu
>>261
ﾌｧｯXの放ったﾃﾞｨﾙﾄﾞｩ3
263:login:Penguin
04/05/19 23:00 w6+/YZ0v
>>253 さすがsgi関連だけあるな。
264:login:Penguin
04/05/29 19:30 l3U6IBB9
>>253
ホントかよ？
quake3なんだが、Win9xほどfps出ないし、
それ以前に画面がキタナイし暗いんだけどね。ガンマあげても白っぽくなるだけだし。
色が単調でなんかポリゴンがペラペラしてる。
このゲームはWinNT系でもガマンがおかしいのだが、それでもlinuxほどではない。
265:login:Penguin
04/05/30 13:38 dDvi++Xm
$ glxgears
7702 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1540.400 FPS
8667 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1733.400 FPS
8667 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1733.400 FPS
radeon9600np
atiダメ杉
266:login:Penguin
04/05/30 18:05 Ax9ShQGg
(´-`).｡oO(地雷の悪寒)
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.clt.jp)
267:login:Penguin
04/05/30 18:47 ebPzeibY
>>264
もうガンマの限界ってやつだな
268: ◆Zsh/ladOX.
04/06/03 22:25 EPR6BdXb
GeForceFX5700+Athlon64 3400+
% x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60700000 on :0.0
from testlinux
Thu Jun 3 22:22:53 2004
Sync time adjustment is 0.0247 msecs.
50000 reps @ 0.1079 msec ( 9270.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
80000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (9200000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
28000 reps @ 0.1992 msec ( 5020.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
3200 reps @ 1.5961 msec ( 627.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
8000 reps @ 0.9067 msec ( 1100.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
269: ◆Zsh/ladOX.
04/06/03 22:26 EPR6BdXb
% glxgears
19737 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3947.400 FPS
22733 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4546.600 FPS
22653 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4530.600 FPS
22708 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4541.600 FPS
22732 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4546.400 FPS
22729 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4545.800 FPS
22729 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4545.800 FPS
270:login:Penguin
04/07/02 20:09 3cvoKqSj
GeForce FX 5200 + Barton2500
だけど
$ glxgears
4397 frames in 5.0 seconds = 879.400 FPS
3882 frames in 5.0 seconds = 776.400 FPS
4389 frames in 5.0 seconds = 877.800 FPS
しかでない。
NVidia 5336 1024x768@24 kernel 2.6.6
271:163,171
04/07/20 23:34 yhbOUsS3
AthlonXP 2500+@ 200x10.5
GeForceFX 5900Ultra
FedoraCore2
nvidia-6106
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60700000 on :0.0
from emerald
Tue Jul 20 23:21:38 2004
Sync time adjustment is 0.0595 msecs.
50000 reps @ 0.1044 msec ( 9580.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
80000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (8170000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
36000 reps @ 0.1477 msec ( 6770.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 5.7721 msec ( 173.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
3200 reps @ 1.5724 msec ( 636.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
glxgears
42748 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8549.600 FPS
42752 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8550.400 FPS
42756 frames in 5.0 seconds = 8551.200 FPS
272:168
04/08/04 22:29 AiRrppB2
xorgにしてみた
ハードウェアは同じ。OSは先週のCURRENT
x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60700000 on :0.0
from おれんち
Wed Aug 4 22:25:51 2004
Sync time adjustment is 0.0485 msecs.
7000 reps @ 0.7468 msec ( 1340.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
8000000 reps @ 0.0010 msec (1030000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
1200 reps @ 4.8932 msec ( 204.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 11.2356 msec ( 89.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1200 reps @ 4.9191 msec ( 203.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
ちょっと遅くなった
273:login:Penguin
04/08/04 23:02 w2T6zF1c
>>270
ほぼ同じ
GeForce FX 5200 + Barton2500
NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-6106-pkg1
1024x768@24 kernel 2.6.7
$ glxgears
3874 frames in 5.0 seconds = 774.800 FPS
4726 frames in 5.0 seconds = 945.200 FPS
4718 frames in 5.0 seconds = 943.600 FPS
4724 frames in 5.0 seconds = 944.800 FPS
似たようなものだけど少し速い。
ドライバ新しいのに代えたらいいよ
カーネルを2.4.26にすると1000FPSを超えた。
274:login:Penguin
04/08/05 12:05 qy2Cd2WY
Matrox QID
coming soon って、今月中には出てくるかな？
275:login:Penguin
04/08/05 13:13 s4XecAt6
6800買いなさい
276:login:Penguin
04/10/07 06:18:26 PT0ctU8L
GF FX5900 XT + AthlonXP 3200+
RedHat EL3 WS
通常時 コア 390Mhz メモリ 700Mhz(350Mhz)
%glxgears
約 5200 FPS
コア 450Mhz メモリ 750Mhz (375Mhz)
%glxgears
約 6100 FPS
277:login:Penguin
04/10/14 13:59:52 jSdLU2Ax
だれかGF6800GTかUltraのglxgearsの結果を張ってください
っていうかglxgearsじゃもう力不足だよなぁ
もっと重たくて手軽な3Dベンチソフトないの？
278: ◆Zsh/ladOX.
04/10/14 23:40:29 C/+pLaM5
>>277
無印だけど。
FedoraCore2(AMD64版)の64は3400+(2.2GHz)ね。
約 9750 FPS
279: ◆Zsh/ladOX.
04/10/14 23:44:12 C/+pLaM5
>>278で800MHz駆動で固定にしたとき。
約 7400 FPS
ちょっとはCPUの能力にも依存してるみたい。
280:login:Penguin
04/10/15 02:32:52 jmPaGxZA
>>278
FX5950より速いね。
次はギガのファンレス無印6800でも買おうかな
281:Quadro FX 3400
05/01/26 22:10:33 SJ77Z0/v
2 x Xeon (3.40GHz) / PC2 3200 ECC DDR2 SDRAM 400MHz 2GB
FC3 @ 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp
nVIDIA Quadro FX 3400 (PCI Express)
Linux-x86-1.0-6629 + patches(URLﾘﾝｸ(www.minion.de))
1400x1050 @115Hz @24bpp
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60801000 on :0.0
Sync time adjustment is 0.0331 msecs.
200000 reps @ 0.0467 msec ( 21400.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
80000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (9870000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
80000 reps @ 0.0905 msec ( 11000.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
2400 reps @ 2.3143 msec ( 432.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
8000 reps @ 1.1382 msec ( 879.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears
70946 frames in 5.0 seconds = 14189.200 FPS
88119 frames in 5.0 seconds = 17623.800 FPS
87924 frames in 5.0 seconds = 17584.800 FPS
87735 frames in 5.0 seconds = 17547.000 FPS
88306 frames in 5.0 seconds = 17661.200 FPS
こんなに速かったのか。。。
282:login:Penguin
05/01/26 22:53:44 X+yOcin4
>>281
すげー!
ちょっとうらやましい
283:login:Penguin
05/01/28 14:05:43 oRo3QPld
sis630 700MHz sdram 192MB 1024x768@16bpp Celeron
xorg 6.8.1
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40300000 on :0.0
Mon Oct 20 15:12:51 2003
Sync time adjustment is 0.0343 msecs.
20000 reps @ 0.3838 msec ( 2610.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
16000000 reps @ 0.0003 msec (3150000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
8000 reps @ 0.6314 msec ( 1580.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 11.6354 msec ( 85.9/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1600 reps @ 3.8680 msec ( 259.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears
3602 frames in 5.0 seconds = 720.400 FPS
3916 frames in 5.0 seconds = 783.200 FPS
3925 frames in 5.0 seconds = 785.000 FPS
3924 frames in 5.0 seconds = 784.800 FPS
3925 frames in 5.0 seconds = 785.000 FPS
おんぼろノートでも結構やれるもんだ･･･。
ちなみに、q3demo は遊べる程度には動く。
284:名無しさん＠お腹いっぱい。
05/01/28 14:06:51 oRo3QPld
まちがった･･･計りなおす･･･
285:283
05/01/28 14:10:04 oRo3QPld
すまん。間違って、コピペ元のデータが違ってた。
でもマシンスペックのわりには、まだがんばってるほうかな
----
sis630 700MHz sdram 192MB 1024x768@16bpp Celeron
xorg 6.8.1
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60801000 on :0.0
Fri Jan 28 14:06:21 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.1000 msecs.
5000 reps @ 1.1614 msec ( 861.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
2400000 reps @ 0.0024 msec (411000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
2000 reps @ 2.7811 msec ( 360.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
240 reps @ 21.0538 msec ( 47.5/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1200 reps @ 5.1514 msec ( 194.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears
1222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 244.400 FPS
1299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 259.800 FPS
1299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 259.800 FPS
1300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 260.000 FPS
1300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 260.000 FPS
286:login:Penguin
05/03/19 20:15:12 dabO4O73
以下の構成でglxgearsを起動した結果が 3671FPS程度というのは，普通の値ですか？
何かがおかしいぐらい遅いですか？
CPU: Pentium4 530J (動作周波数: 3GHz)
M/B: MSI 915P Combo-FR (チップセット: Intel915P+ICH6)
メモリ: DDR2 533 512MBx2
グラフィック: ELSA Gladiac 743 256MB (PCI Express, GeForce6600)
ディストリビューション: Fedora Core 3
カーネル: 2.6.10-1.770_FC3smp
グラフィックドライバ: nVidia IA32 1.0-7167
287:login:Penguin
05/03/20 04:23:48 Kg8b+7kR
>>286
ほぼ同等の構成で6600GTだけど
(Gainward Ultra/1960 PCX XP 128M)
$ glxgears
33726 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6745.200 FPS
33843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6768.600 FPS
33876 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6775.200 FPS
33839 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6767.800 FPS
33848 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6769.600 FPS
288:login:Penguin
05/03/20 09:42:37 GRI7IyW3
x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60802000 on :0.0
Sync time adjustment is 0.0468 msecs.
40000 reps @ 0.1702 msec ( 5880.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
28000000 reps @ 0.0002 msec (5230000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
40000 reps @ 0.1356 msec ( 7380.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 10.7697 msec ( 92.9/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1200 reps @ 5.4753 msec ( 183.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
289:286
05/03/20 17:54:37 t5Kxmd2q
>>287
うげ，オレの場合半分近いスピードしか出てないですね．
特にエラーメッセージとかは出ていないみたいなんですが，これは何かの設定が
間違っていたりすることを疑った方がいいのでしょうか？
290:286
05/03/20 19:46:08 t5Kxmd2q
…もしかして，画面全体の大きさは関係ありますか？
前の結果はUXGA(1600x1200)のときのものです．
といいつつ，現在そのマシンとは別の場所にいるのですぐにはテスト
できないのですが…．
291:login:Penguin
05/03/21 05:28:25 hUES7Pf+
6600GTは6600の1.8倍ぐらいと考えれば妥当な結果では?
あとELSAはメモリが遅いらしいのでそんなもんじゃないかと。
ちなみに >>287 は1280x1024のデュアルモニタでの結果ね。
292:286
05/03/21 17:57:07 WHNywpjj
>>291
なるほど，納得です．というか，自分のボードの性能もろくすっぽ調べずの質問，
すんませんでした．
ありがとうございました．
293:login:Penguin
05/04/17 11:51:57 v0gEhHtG
グラフィックカードが壊れたので
Ti4200からFX5200にしたらテレビがカクカクするようになった・・・鬱氏
294:login:Penguin
05/04/17 15:44:07 /kjiBBhY
おい藻前ら、VolariとUniChromeのX11ドライバがオープンソース化ですよ。
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.xgitech.com)
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.via.com.tw)
295:login:Penguin
05/04/23 00:26:34 oc4AIXvA
ET-6000
296:login:Penguin
05/07/19 12:48:25 Da9jeUbG
現状ではatiは糞ということですか？
297:login:Penguin
05/07/25 21:58:27 ECjw8BtG
URLﾘﾝｸ(dri.freedesktop.org)の情報見て
Option "EnablePageFlip" "true"
を追加したら、glxgearsが
3398 frames in 5.0 seconds = 679.600 FPS
が
5219 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1043.800 FPS
になった。
298:login:Penguin
05/07/26 22:02:31 zAFZDB46
Sempron2800+(1.6GHz)
GeForceFX5200
1280x1024@24bpp
$x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40400000 on :0.0
from hoge.fuga.jp
Tue Jul 26 21:29:54 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0162 msecs.
30000 reps @ 0.1933 msec ( 5170.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0004 msec (2240000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
16000 reps @ 0.4000 msec ( 2500.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
240 reps @ 21.1748 msec ( 47.2/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
400 reps @ 13.3660 msec ( 74.8/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
素のFX5200のが見当たらなかったから貼っときますね。
299:login:Penguin
05/07/26 22:06:57 zAFZDB46
Sempron2800+(1.6GHz)
GeForceFX5200
1280x1024@24bpp
$x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40400000 on :0.0
from hoge.fuga.jp
Tue Jul 26 21:29:54 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0162 msecs.
30000 reps @ 0.1933 msec ( 5170.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0004 msec (2240000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
16000 reps @ 0.4000 msec ( 2500.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
240 reps @ 21.1748 msec ( 47.2/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
400 reps @ 13.3660 msec ( 74.8/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
素のFX5200のが見当たらなかったから貼っときますね。
300:login:Penguin
05/07/26 22:08:13 zAFZDB46
Sempron2800+(1.6GHz)
GeForceFX5200
1280x1024@24bpp
$x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The XFree86 Project, Inc server version 40400000 on :0.0
from hoge.fuga.jp
Tue Jul 26 21:29:54 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0162 msecs.
30000 reps @ 0.1933 msec ( 5170.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0004 msec (2240000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
16000 reps @ 0.4000 msec ( 2500.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
240 reps @ 21.1748 msec ( 47.2/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
400 reps @ 13.3660 msec ( 74.8/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
素のFX5200のが見当たらなかったから貼っときますね。
301:login:Penguin
05/07/26 22:26:34 zAFZDB46
連投すまん。
302:login:Penguin
05/07/26 22:33:16 zAFZDB46
連投すまない。
303:login:Penguin
05/07/28 15:13:26 3qgpUw3e
ﾜﾛｽ
304:login:Penguin
05/07/28 21:35:39 hd9EvzIU
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
Gentoo (The X.Org Foundation 6.8.2, revision r2-0.1.9) server version 60802000 on :0.0
from localPC
Thu Jul 28 21:29:03 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0536 msecs.
20000 reps @ 0.3045 msec ( 3280.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0006 msec (1740000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
8000 reps @ 0.7541 msec ( 1330.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
1200 reps @ 4.1638 msec ( 240.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
8000 reps @ 1.0433 msec ( 959.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
i852GM/celeron2.0GHz(northwood-256)/762
305:login:Penguin
05/07/29 00:13:40 T2d3qS85
pen4 2.4GHz
GeForce Ti4200
3200x1200@24bpp
% x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60802000 on :0.0
from aaaaa
Fri Jul 29 00:09:03 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0885 msecs.
30000 reps @ 0.2528 msec ( 3960.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
8000000 reps @ 0.0009 msec (1170000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
12000 reps @ 0.4715 msec ( 2120.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
240 reps @ 28.4199 msec ( 35.2/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
800 reps @ 11.4764 msec ( 87.1/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
かなりできが悪い気がしますが、3200x1200だからですかね？
306:login:Penguin
05/07/29 02:23:14 K0LZcKyV
どっちが速いのかほんと分りにくい。
304<305:500x500 rectangle
304>305:Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
304<305:Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
304>305:PutImage 500x500 square
304>305:ShmPutImage 500x500 square
二勝三敗で304の方が速いと読むの?
でも305は3200x1200だから305の方が速い?
普通に考えればGeForceの方が速いはずですよね?
307:login:Penguin
05/08/15 23:39:40 KtkrzEBl
GIGABYTERS350(オンボードRADEON9100IGP)にATI提供のfglrxドライバを入れた。
しかしウィンドウモードglxgearsが96fps・・・。
308:login:Penguin
05/08/17 15:46:22 NLiVPdYC
入れただけでは動かない。
309:login:Penguin
05/08/30 02:17:57 R72YiM1z
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.watch.impress.co.jp)
最新GPUでヒートシンクレスのビデオカード登場、「Volari Z7」採用
ｽﾚﾘﾝｸ(jisaku板:670番)
ｽﾚﾘﾝｸ(jisaku板:688番)
310: ◆Zsh/ladOX.
05/09/10 02:03:49 Zy3v3Tcp
wget fURLﾘﾝｸ(ftpsv1.u-aizu.ac.jp)
tar zxf SPECViewperf81.tar.gz
cd SPECViewperf81/src
./Configure (3を選択)
..
./Run_All.csh
結果
3dsmax-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 4.725
catia-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 6.540
ensight-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 3.190
light-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 5.810
maya-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 7.222
proe-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 6.455
sw-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 3.845
ugs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 2.461
ハード
VCard: nVIDIA Quadro QVS 280
CPU: Athlon64 4400+
311:login:Penguin
05/09/27 10:14:34 r9N+3M1Q
Run All Summary
3dsmax-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 1.292
catia-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 0.7127
ensight-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 0.9702
light-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 2.419
maya-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 2.326
proe-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 1.023
sw-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 0.00000
ugs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 0.00000
localPC SPECViewperf81 #
Mobile-Celeron2.4/i852GM
紙芝居状態。
312: ◆Zsh/ladOX.
05/09/27 19:37:59 Z8oQAVd7
>>311
乙。
そのｵﾝﾎﾞVGAだとｷﾂｲだろな…
313: ◆SQ2Wyjdi7M
05/09/30 11:24:23 BqnwFEfQ
Pen4 2.8C GHz
GeForce 6200
1280 x 1024, 24-bit
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60802000 on :0.0
from momiji
Fri Sep 30 04:14:58 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0383 msecs.
30000 reps @ 0.2107 msec ( 4750.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
32000000 reps @ 0.0002 msec (6320000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
20000 reps @ 0.3031 msec ( 3300.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
1200 reps @ 5.2464 msec ( 191.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
3600 reps @ 1.5493 msec ( 645.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears
15867 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3173.400 FPS
19044 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3808.800 FPS
19047 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3809.400 FPS
19038 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3807.600 FPS
314:login:Penguin
05/10/06 11:37:40 KQCHFi0W
DVI で 1920*1200 がいけるカードってありますか？
315: ◆Zsh/ladOX.
05/10/06 21:06:30 jggcm+5I
nVIDIAだと、
・QuadroFX1400以上
・GeForce7800以上
以上ｴﾙｻﾞのサイトより。
ATIは知らん。
316:login:Penguin
05/10/08 22:29:47 nBYkokS0
Dual Link対応なら6800シリーズの中にもあったような
317:login:Penguin
05/12/12 19:26:44 +mvPmEwO
Ath64 3800+
Gefo7800GT
FC4 x86_64
$ glxgears
77363 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15472.600 FPS
318:login:Penguin
05/12/12 22:29:37 MBmsS0nx
Athlon64 X2 3800+
GeForce 6100
1024x768@24bpp
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60802000 on :0.0
from localhost.localdomain
Mon Dec 12 22:16:46 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0498 msecs.
20000 reps @ 0.3255 msec ( 3070.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0006 msec (1810000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
12000 reps @ 0.5813 msec ( 1720.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 4.3280 msec ( 231.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
1600 reps @ 3.1501 msec ( 317.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears -v
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_DIMS=4096/4096
GL_RENDERER = GeForce 6100/PCI/SSE2/3DNOW!
GL_VERSION = 2.0.1 NVIDIA 81.74
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
GL_EXTENSIONS = ...
5722 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1144.400 FPS
6789 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1357.800 FPS
6789 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1357.800 FPS
6797 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1359.400 FPS
6799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1359.800 FPS
7800GTは 桁違いの性能ってことか...
6150はどのくらいか気になる...
319:login:Penguin
05/12/16 14:54:05 YYMqCFpJ
RIVA TNT2/TNT2 Pro
~$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500
Sync time adjustment is 0.0750 msecs.
9000 reps @ 0.6015 msec ( 1660.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
8000000 reps @ 0.0006 msec (1650000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
4000 reps @ 1.2340 msec ( 810.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
200 reps @ 27.6600 msec ( 36.2/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
~$ glxgears
2378 frames in 5.0 seconds = 475.600 FPS
2794 frames in 5.0 seconds = 558.800 FPS
2796 frames in 5.0 seconds = 559.200 FPS
2745 frames in 5.0 seconds = 549.000 FPS
今売ってる1まんえん位のに取り換えたら、すごく速くなりそうな気がします
320:login:Penguin
05/12/17 20:31:52 CPjwei2H
ATI 3D Rage P/M Mobility-M 8MB (AGPx2)
mobileDuron 800Mhz
K7S5A
1280x1024(16bpp)
~> x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60802000 on :?.?
from linux
Sync time adjustment is 0.0819 msecs.
4000 reps @ 1.5373 msec ( 650.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
4000000 reps @ 0.0013 msec (774000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
2400 reps @ 2.2247 msec ( 450.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 9.7921 msec ( 102.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
~> glxgears
835 frames in 5.0 seconds = 167.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
840 frames in 5.0 seconds = 168.000 FPS
720 frames in 5.0 seconds = 144.000 FPS
内蔵ビデオ物より遅い。
321:317
05/12/17 22:01:51 /G/WED6/
driver 入れ替えたのでもう一度
Ath64 3800+
Gefo7800GT
FC4 x86_64
nvidia 8174
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60802000 on :0.0
from localhost.localdomain
Sat Dec 17 21:56:48 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0289 msecs.
90000 reps @ 0.0573 msec ( 17500.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
40000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (7360000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
80000 reps @ 0.0818 msec ( 12200.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
1600 reps @ 3.6669 msec ( 273.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears -v
Window x=0, y=0, width=300, height=300
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_DIMS=4096/4096
GL_RENDERER = GeForce 7800 GT/PCI/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 2.0.1 NVIDIA 81.74
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
67343 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13468.600 FPS
67310 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13462.000 FPS
67192 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13438.400 FPS
66950 frames in 5.0 seconds = 13390.000 FPS
322:320
05/12/20 23:08:31 12W0/sZ+
Matrox G550
mobileDuron 800Mhz
K7S5A
1280x1024(24bpp)
~>x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 60802000 on :0.0
from linux
Tue Dec 20 23:03:23 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0859 msecs.
9000 reps @ 0.6252 msec ( 1600.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
8000000 reps @ 0.0010 msec (998000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
3600 reps @ 1.3903 msec ( 719.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
280 reps @ 18.5518 msec ( 53.9/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
~>glxgears
1878 frames in 5.0 seconds = 375.600 FPS
2172 frames in 5.0 seconds = 434.400 FPS
2172 frames in 5.0 seconds = 434.400 FPS
2174 frames in 5.0 seconds = 434.800 FPS
うーん遅い。
323:login:Penguin
05/12/21 02:15:28 EzHIxchJ
メモも兼ねて…。Canopus SpectraX21@1280x1024x24,60Hz
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage00 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
Gentoo (The X.Org Foundation 6.8.2, revision r60-0.1.13) server version 60802000 on :0.0
from moderato
Wed Dec 21 02:10:08 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0475 msecs.
40000 reps @ 0.1383 msec ( 7230.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
40000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (7250000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
12000 reps @ 0.4328 msec ( 2310.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
800 reps @ 8.3012 msec ( 120.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
2800 reps @ 2.0617 msec ( 485.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
324:login:Penguin
05/12/22 01:23:45 u8LKwelZ
Athlon64 X2 4200+
GeForce6150@A8N-VM CSM
1600x1200@24bit
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
Gentoo (The X.Org Foundation 6.8.2, revision r6-0.1.13) server version 60802000 on :0.0
from regulus
Thu Dec 22 01:20:26 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0241 msecs.
20000 reps @ 0.3055 msec ( 3270.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
16000000 reps @ 0.0004 msec (2600000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
12000 reps @ 0.4482 msec ( 2230.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
2400 reps @ 2.2413 msec ( 446.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
3600 reps @ 1.4824 msec ( 675.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears -v
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_DIMS=4096/4096
GL_RENDERER = GeForce 6150/PCI/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 2.0.1 NVIDIA 81.74
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
7468 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1493.600 FPS
8556 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1711.200 FPS
8557 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1711.400 FPS
8560 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1712.000 FPS
7800GTすげぇ…
325:login:Penguin
05/12/23 04:33:14 gplELltk
GTX 512の結果も気になるな
入手困難だけど、、、
326:login:Penguin
05/12/23 07:21:10 4j7v9Pwu
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
Sync time adjustment is 0.0207 msecs.
40000 reps @ 0.1257 msec ( 7950.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0005 msec (2070000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
32000 reps @ 0.1719 msec ( 5820.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
1200 reps @ 4.6622 msec ( 214.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
4000 reps @ 1.3704 msec ( 730.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears -v
37596 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7519.200 FPS
37607 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7521.400 FPS
37598 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7519.600 FPS
37611 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7522.200 FPS
327:↑326
05/12/23 07:22:19 4j7v9Pwu
すまぬ。
Athlon64 3200+
GeForce6600GT
1600x1200@24bit
328:login:Penguin
05/12/24 11:50:27 nA56Jed6
インスコ成功したので記念カキコ
let's note CF-W4 Pentium M 1.20GHz intel i915G内蔵
kernel 2.6.14-gentoo-r5
X.Org 7.0 1024x768(24bpp) driver:i810(dri on)
x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 70000000 on :0.0
Sat Dec 24 11:41:41 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0319 msecs.
20000 reps @ 0.4467 msec ( 2240.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
8000000 reps @ 0.0009 msec (1070000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
8000 reps @ 0.8862 msec ( 1130.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
1600 reps @ 3.3148 msec ( 302.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
glxgears
4505 frames in 5.0 seconds = 900.909 FPS
4118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 823.518 FPS
4110 frames in 5.0 seconds = 821.901 FPS
shmput500動かず・・・
329:login:Penguin
05/12/29 16:02:19 cAM0Af5v
24じゃなくて32bitってどうやればできるの？
330:login:Penguin
05/12/30 14:41:57 fLgT7G9y
satellite J10 Pentium4-M 2.2GHz/i852GM
kernel 2.6.14-gentoo-r5
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
Gentoo (The X.Org Foundation 6.8.2, revision r6-0.1.13) server version 60802000 on :0.0
Fri Dec 30 14:23:09 2005
Sync time adjustment is 0.0348 msecs.
20000 reps @ 0.3043 msec ( 3290.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
12000000 reps @ 0.0006 msec (1760000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
8000 reps @ 0.7535 msec ( 1330.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
1600 reps @ 3.4244 msec ( 292.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
glxgears
4506 frames in 5.0 seconds = 901.200 FPS
4870 frames in 5.0 seconds = 974.000 FPS
4866 frames in 5.0 seconds = 973.200 FPS
331:login:Penguin
06/01/30 05:57:41 vwdmDpou
X.org X11R7になってRadeon r3xx/r4xxでのDRIがサポートされたみたいだけど実際どのくらい早くなったの？
332:login:Penguin
06/02/05 23:09:37 R8Cdo3VO
参考までに
リモート
Celeron2.6Ghz
ローカル:
Athlon64 3800+
ATI X700
リモートローカル間は100BASE/Tで接続
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The Cygwin/X Project server version 60802000 on hogehoge:0.0
from hogehoge
Sun Feb 5 23:02:24 2006
Sync time adjustment is 0.3144 msecs.
5000 reps @ 1.1641 msec ( 859.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
3600000 reps @ 0.0029 msec (339000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
4000 reps @ 1.3118 msec ( 762.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
80 reps @ 85.2001 msec ( 11.7/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears
3059 frames in 5.0 seconds = 611.800 FPS
3059 frames in 5.0 seconds = 611.800 FPS
3077 frames in 5.0 seconds = 615.400 FPS
3059 frames in 5.0 seconds = 611.800 FPS
333:login:Penguin
06/02/08 23:37:23 0+OFCsaz
ATIドライバをやっとちゃんと設定出来たっぽいので記念に
Athlon64 X2 3800+
Radeon X700 Pro
1280x1024(24bit)
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
Gentoo (The X.Org Foundation 6.8.2, revision r6-0.1.13) server version 60802000 on :0.0
from xxxxxx
Wed Feb 8 23:25:08 2006
Sync time adjustment is 0.0257 msecs.
40000 reps @ 0.1596 msec ( 6270.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
8000000 reps @ 0.0009 msec (1170000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
8000 reps @ 0.9867 msec ( 1010.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
2800 reps @ 1.9437 msec ( 514.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
8000 reps @ 1.0234 msec ( 977.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears -v
21881 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4376.200 FPS
21908 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4381.600 FPS
21910 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4382.000 FPS
21901 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4380.200 FPS
334:login:Penguin
06/02/20 09:53:02 AQFTABsC
XGLとかきたので、OpenGLが早いグラフィックカードとドライバの組み合わせで
このスレの需要が沸いてきたか。
335:login:Penguin
06/04/08 19:44:21 Kepsi3Wp
Athlon64 X2 4200+
GeForce 7600GS
1600x1200(24bit)
$ x11perf -repeat 1 -rect500 -f14text16 -copypixwin500 -putimage500 -shmput500
x11perf - X11 performance program, version 1.5
The X.Org Foundation server version 70000000 on :0.0
from example
Sat Apr 8 19:34:53 2006
Sync time adjustment is 0.0467 msecs.
60000 reps @ 0.0874 msec ( 11400.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
80000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (9480000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
28000 reps @ 0.2023 msec ( 4940.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
2800 reps @ 1.8953 msec ( 528.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
8000 reps @ 0.9760 msec ( 1020.0/sec): ShmPutImage 500x500 square
$ glxgears -info
GL_RENDERER = GeForce 7600 GS/PCI/SSE2
GL_VERSION = 2.0.2 NVIDIA 87.56
GL_VENDOR = NVIDIA Corporation
GL_EXTENSIONS = ...
29942 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5988.245 FPS
30787 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6157.362 FPS
30776 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6155.200 FPS
30775 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6154.855 FPS
いつのまにかglxgearsのオプションが変わってた。
336:login:Penguin
06/05/10 15:41:00 WWmOincu
AthlonXP 3200+
GeForce FX5900 XT
1600x1200(24bit)
$ glxgears
6557.362 FPS
GeForce 7600GSより5900XTのほうが速いみたい
337:login:Penguin
06/05/11 01:44:34 ym0IJ2oQ
>>336
ドライバは？
338:login:Penguin
06/05/11 04:39:44 OOm4cFNz
>>337
1.0-8756
339:login:Penguin
06/05/11 17:45:51 ozki/isW
glxgearsはメモリのバンド幅に敏感なアプリみたいよ
340:login:Penguin
06/06/03 00:56:58 D6UiAs8o
マザーを変えて PCI Express になったんで、
それまで使ってたファンレス RADEON 9800 Pro から、
GeForce 6200 TurboCache に替えてみた(3800圓也)。
ここまで遅くて、何かに付けてCPUの負荷が高くなる
とは思わなかった orz TurboCache が癌なのか?
ドライバの安定感は nVidia の方が圧倒的に上だが…
341:login:Penguin
06/06/06 01:09:58 B3ttBTTJ
Athlon64 X2 4800+
GeForce FX7900 GT
1920x1200(24bit)
Fedora Core 5 (x86_64)
xengine:
106960.8rpm
glxgears:
78719 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15743.643 FPS
78992 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15798.213 FPS
78211 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15642.062 FPS
78818 frames in 5.0 seconds = 15763.543 FPS
x11perf:
200000 reps @ 0.0324 msec (30900.0/sec): 500x500 rectangle
80000000 reps @ 0.0001 msec (7300000.0/sec): Char16 in 40-char line (k14)
80000 reps @ 0.0630 msec (15900.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from pixmap to window
2800 reps @ 1.8334 msec (545.0/sec): PutImage 500x500 square
FC5 の x11perf には何故か -shmput500 がない
次ページ最新レス表示スレッドの検索類似スレ一覧話題のニュースおまかせリスト▼オプションを表示暇つぶし2ch
5368日前に更新/256 KB
担当:undef