【沖縄】玉城デニー「私は保守中道」　自民党県議「は？お前の支持団体アカやんけ」「本当の保守は国防をしっかり行う」

【沖縄】玉城デニー「 ..

19:あなたの1票は無駄になりました
18/10/23 07:47:20.12 KLNpel1u0.net
>>10
保守主義（自由主義保守思想）の父とされるバークは共産党、共産シンパや自称愛国国士こと国家社会主義者の言うところの新自由主義者のような主張をしている
Adam Smith and Edmund Burke
ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=poroi
Although the Scots philosopher Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations (1776) found few insightful readers in
England before the l790s, Smith himself noted that among what early readers he had the Anglo-Irish
Whig Member of Parliament Edmund. Burke stood out (Tribe 1984; Teichgraber, 1985). Smith informed
a confidant that Burke “is the only man I ever knew who, without communication, thought on economic
subjects exactly as I”
They became correspondents and friends. But
while Smith made it clear that government support should be extended in
hard times to unemployed workers, who have a right to expect it, Burke
flatly denied it. “Labor,” he wrote in l795, “is a commodity and as such an
article of trade” (Burke, 1795, in Kramnick, 1999, 200). Trade, Burke
declared, is none of government’s business under any circumstances. “Of all
things,” he wrote, “an indiscreet tampering with the trade of provisions is the
most dangerous and … always worst … in the time of scarcity” (Burke,
1795, in Kramnick, 1999, 195).
If anyone deserves relief it is not those who
are able to work but in hard times can’t find it. It is those, and only those,
who are too sick, infirm, young, or old to work at all. They do indeed fall
under our Christian duty to extend charity to the poor (Burke, 1795, in
Kramnick 203). But the deserving poor, as they came to be called, are
objects of our charity only insofar as we, and they, are private persons.
Government, whose office to “regulate our tempers” by “timely coercion,”
should stay out of it. “The people maintain [the government], not they the
people” (Burke, 1795, in Kramnick, 195)
バークの思想背景は経済的には小さな政府であり、教会も含めた民間の活動の自由は
保証し政府は軍事・外交以外の余計な事はしないようにアダム・スミスを強く諌め商業活動に
政府が関与すべきでないと明言している

次ページ

続きを表示

1を表示